Prisoner’s new confession ruled credible by courts

Prisoner’s new confession ruled credible by courts

CLEMENT BRITT/TIMES-DISPATCH

Dustin Turner is serving an 82-year sentence for the murder of Jennifer Evans, even though Billy Joe Brown now takes sole responsibliity for the crime.

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

BILL GEROUX TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
Published: December 3, 2008

SPECIAL SERIES: What Happened To Jennifer Evans?
Fifth of 5 parts

VIRGINIA BEACH — He looked thinner and prematurely aged after 12 years in Virginia's hardest prisons, but ex-Navy SEAL trainee Billy Joe Brown still mesmerized.

"Whether or not you believe me is really not my concern," he said this May from the witness box in Virginia Beach Circuit Court, where in 1996 he and his former best friend, Dustin A. Turner, were convicted of murdering Jennifer Evans.

In a new twist, Billy testified he had found Jesus in prison and had decided to confess that he alone choked Jennifer to death, as Dustin had claimed. Billy said he had no interest in helping Dustin -- "I'd let him rot" -- but he did not want to stand before God a liar.

"I'm here to glorify Jesus Christ by telling the truth," Billy told Circuit Judge Frederick Lowe at an unusual hearing to help decide whether Dustin should go free.

But was Billy telling the truth?

Billy seemed at ease May 28 in shackles and an orange jumpsuit, after being transported to Virginia Beach from his cell at Greensville Correctional Center to testify. He showed little interest in Dustin, sitting at the defendant's table, or in Jennifer's family and friends in the front row.

He told the judge that in 1995, he and Dustin belonged to a small sub-brotherhood of SEALs and trainees who enjoyed breaking all the rules. "We'd drink and smoke [marijuana] and have sex with girls," Billy said. "Extremes, always going to extremes."

He said he and others took illegal steroids that helped them recover quickly from injuries but also made them more aggressive.

Billy laughed as he recalled building up such a tolerance to alcohol that he could drink a case of beer and a fifth of rum in a day. "That was quite a goal," he said. "It took me a while to achieve that."

. . .

On the night he killed Jennifer, Billy said, he arrived at The Bayou drunk and proceeded to down about 30 drinks, including shots of bourbon, beers and mixed drinks.

He was not interested in women that night, he said, because he had gone home with one from the club the previous night. He had a steady girlfriend and didn't want her to catch on about his cheating.

Dustin approached him around closing time and told Billy he was "hooking up" with Jennifer and wanted Billy to get a ride back to the SEAL barracks at nearby Little Creek Amphibious Base with a mutual friend.

But Billy got impatient and walked into the parking lot, where he found Dustin and Jennifer sitting in the front seats of Dustin's silver Geo Storm hatchback. Billy said he climbed into the cramped rear seat, directly behind Jennifer, and began making crude remarks to her and touching her hair.

Then, Billy said in May, "I snapped and started choking her. . . . And I think Dusty -- I believe I recall him trying to pull my arm away. I believe he did."

Jennifer managed a breath of air, Billy said, but he quickly clamped his arm back around her throat and resumed choking her until blood came from her nose and he knew she was dead. He said he did not recall Dustin intervening again.

Billy said he did not know what made him kill.

"One minute I was normal, the next minute I was gone, and then I said, 'Whoa.' But then it was too late and I knew it was too late. . . . There was no reason, no rhyme, no thought, no nothing."

He immediately passed out and then awoke about 45 minutes later in the car in Newport News Park, where Dustin had driven the three of them. There, Billy said, he helped Dustin carry Jennifer's body into the trees. He began to take off his clothes and was planning to sexually assault Jennifer's body, but Dustin yelled, "Man, get in the car," and Billy did, he testified.

In the front row of the courtroom, Jennifer's mother lay her head on her husband's shoulder.

. . .

Under cross-examination by Virginia Deputy Attorney General Robert H. Anderson, Billy acknowledged having been so drunk that he remembered only parts of that night. Billy said he had not remembered Dustin trying to break his grip on Jennifer until he read an account of Dustin's trial in the newspaper.

Billy readily agreed he had told a series of lies about the killing. He explained how he had fashioned each lie to fit his goals at the moment.

His secret? "Lie without conscience."

At first, he was so angry at Dustin for betraying him that he decided to take Dustin down, too, he said. "I made up a story. I figured they'd rather have two than one, so I said we both did it. I figured they would believe that, given our history of group sex and things like that. So it was an easy story to sell."

When Billy first tried to confess from prison to Jennifer's murder, in 1999, his lawyer did not believe him. Billy insisted the lawyer contact authorities. Then Billy had second thoughts and quickly called the lawyer back and said -- falsely -- that the confession he just had finished making was a lie.

Considering Billy's record of lying, deputy attorney general Anderson asked, why should anyone believe him now?

Billy replied without heat that he did not care if anyone did. He had thrown away all his legal papers, he said. He did not expect to get out of prison; all that mattered was clearing his slate with God.

As for his future, "Whatever the good Lord wills. I am not worried about it."

. . .

Billy's performance left the crowded courtroom buzzing.

Jennifer's mother found Billy unconvincing. To other listeners, including a police officer who had worked on the case, Billy's story rang weirdly true.

Lowe ruled three weeks later that Billy's confession was credible. The judge did not elaborate.

He sent his findings back to the Virginia Court of Appeals, where a panel of three judges has to decide whether the confession was significant enough that "no rational trier of fact" would have convicted Dustin of murder after hearing it.

Dustin's lawyer, David Hargett of Richmond, argued Dustin was guilty of nothing more serious than being an accessory after the fact, a misdemeanor with a maximum penalty of one year in jail.

The Court of Appeals has asked both sides to file more legal briefs and prepare oral arguments in the case. A decision is unlikely before spring.

. . .

Dustin, 33, who goes by Dusty, is incarcerated at Powhatan Correctional Center, where he receives regular calls, letters and visits from family and friends, including a former girlfriend, Anitra Branyan, who testified for him at his trial.

His mother, Linda Summitt, drove 12 hours from Indiana to Powhatan to visit him during last week's Thanksgiving holiday.

"They know I'm not a bad guy, that I'm not a criminal," Dustin said in a telephone interview last week from Powhatan. Only the SEALs have cut all ties.

Dustin said he is guilty only of helping Billy hide Jennifer's murder instead of turning Billy over to police. At age 20, he said, "I was forced to make a decision when I was in complete shock. I obviously made the wrong decision. It was wrong legally and probably morally, too. I just took off and drove."

He said he thinks Billy quickly broke Jennifer's neck and that "nowhere at that point could I have done anything for Jennifer. She was still dead."

Dustin said the truth got lost in the emotion of the case. He doesn't expect Jennifer's family to forgive him, "but I think they should know the truth."

He said he believes Billy's confession will prompt the courts to free him from his 82-year sentence. "I never once accepted that sentence as my fate," he said.

He envisions going home to Bloomington and enrolling at Indiana University. But first, "I've got a lot of catching up to do," he said. He never has used a cell phone or been on the Internet.

"I've never forgiven Billy Brown for what he's done," Dustin said last week. Even now, Billy has come clean for the wrong reasons, trying to settle with God for his own sake, when he should apologize to those whose lives he has ruined, Dustin said.

"He's still a psychopath."


Contact Bill Geroux at (757) 498-2820 or .

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Jim68 ) on December 09, 2008 at 11:47 am

Okay,
I’ve read about all there is to read about this case and have come to the conclusion that this five day spread has barely scratched the surface of this, and perhaps intentionally.
I’ve looked the entire thing over and don’t believe the mother’s website “www.freedust.com” was ever mentioned. Her extensive work in trying to prove her son’s innocence is beyond the scope, and directing people to her website would seem thourough.
The fact that the documentary film about this case was not only never sited, but not even mentioned shows a real attempt to keep some facts from the public. Wouldn’t you want to interview those people to find out what they know about the case and put it in your article?
I was amazed when I started looking into it how little Mr Geroux covered about the case. A 40 minute phone call to Mr Turner? He, apparently has never met the man this article is about. Journalistic integrity would merit an hour drive to Powhatan to meet the guy, wouldn’t it? Why nothing about the evidence in the case? Surely, it must say something one way or the other.
Again, pure amazement at the facts that are out there, and never presented.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIUdOG_wWiQ&feature=related

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Jim68 ) on December 05, 2008 at 3:19 pm

EM,
I consider 82 years w/o parole to be vigilante justice. I’d rather be shot (that is not an invitation).
The important point of all of this is that if Brown is telling the truth, Turner has served enough time for his part of covering up the crime for 8 days. You’ve said you agree with that, so we’ve got that going for us.
Two points though:
1. How is taking a girl out to your car to wait for her friends, who will arrive any minute - initiating the event? He had no way to know Brown would abandon his ride home and show up at his car.
2. Remorsefulness and accepting responsibility. I don’t know how remorseful I would be over something like this if I felt I had nothing to do with the actual murder. I would probably feel guilty about not coming forward quicker, but I’m sure he rationalizes that to his loyalty to his swim buddy. If his story is true, I’m also sure he thought the system would sort it all out and he’d be properly charged. When it didn’t, I assume it would be easy to consider yourself a victim.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( EM ) on December 05, 2008 at 2:22 pm

Vigilante justice?  haha, I didn’t suggest somebody peel a cap in the guy.  Did you see the new Punisher movie or something?  I will admit that legally, if his story is true, Dustin has probably served enough time.  I’m just saying that based on his initiation of the event, his complicity and his cover up he is almost equally culpable as Billy boy in my opinion.  And what bothers me also (and I could be wrong but it is my perception) is that Dustin doesn’t really seem remoresful about his actions and inactions and the consequences they have had on an entire family.  I think that he feels that he is the victim which couldn’t be further from the truth.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Jim68 ) on December 05, 2008 at 1:53 pm

The fact that Turner engaged in a consensual group sexual encounter with five other potential frog men and one young woman is about as relevant to rape as his TV viewing habits.
It was not even allowed into evidence in Brown’s trial; but for some reason Judge John Moore seemed to think the jury needed to hear about a single event that happened out in Coronado. All kinds of gossip was spread by people that didn’t even know them about them out on the prowl, but there is no actual evidence or testimony of that.
You’d have to arrest half the SEAL Teams and male pro athletes for being potential abductor/murderers, if consensual sex with multiple partners were a precursor.
The Soundings, a Navy paper, reported that Miss Evans had been assaulted with an “inanimate object.“ Completely bogus. Where did these stories come from? Why do people think they know what happened, when the evidence supports what Turner said from the beginning?
With a little effort, people can become informed on the facts. Otherwise, your just expressing your opinion based on gut reaction and vigilante justice.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( SWCC92 ) on December 05, 2008 at 1:18 pm

Again, you make assumptions that just aren’t in the facts or testimony.
A girl going on her own out to a car with a guy to wait for her friends return is not being “lured.“
Go sit in the drivers seat of a Geo Storm (assuming you are 6’2” and 190 lbs) and try to move around to attack someone in the back seat. This is what Turner would have to have done to stop Brown.
The bottom line is you don’t accept Brown’s latest account and that is your prerogative. But if Brown were telling the truth back in 1995, which is what the prosecution based its case on: why isn’t there any physical or forensic evidence to support that theory? Wouldn’t there be hair and blood, etc. in the back seat of the car - which is where Brown said she was when he got to the car.
Of course Deloris and Al Evans are the most damaged by this crime. It is a horrible event, and we all sympathize for them and their grief. But locking a 20 year old kid up for the rest of his life for a crime (abduction/murder) he did not commit, does not bring her back.
Is 13 years enough for accessory after the fact? I don’t know, but VA law says it is a one year misdemeanor.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Sister Valerie ) on December 05, 2008 at 10:55 am

I would like to set the record straight.I am not making this a race issue,but facts are facts and we don’t want to acknowledge the truth.My concern is for this young ladies family,by releasing this man early is there relief for them,they will never see their daughter again and this mother can touch and visit her child whenever.He also has no forgiveness in his heart.The fact that he had delayed reactions all around the board with this issue bothers my spirit.What really was the plan?He is just as responsible there’s no question he could have prevented this from happening.When looking at law and justice they have different meaning in this country.Laws are set up, but is there real justice when it comes to certain people in this country. I am surprise he recieved 82years really. My prayers go out to this young ladies family, has anyone considered their feelings.They are very courageous people remaining humble.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( EM ) on December 05, 2008 at 10:20 am

Okey dokey, SWCC92, saying we have a black president is not the same thing as saying black people don’t get a fair shake in the legal system which is what two earlier posters said. As far as the rape scenario goes they both admit to gangbanging drunk girls previously (per the TD writer’s story)so it would always be an option with these two.  I say Turner was tricked because per the TD writer’s story Dustin was already questioned twice and subjected to a polygraph when he finally said she was dead and lead them to the body.  Heck he claimed to not even have talked to a Jennifer that night, great guy.
Jim 68,
Of course if she was hit by a car then it wouldn’t have been Dustin’s fault.  I’m talking about stuff within his control and being a guy trained to have the skills to kill and being 6’2” 190 it was well within his ability to stop Billy or at least put up a fight which by briefly grabbing Billy’s arm (assuming that’s true) doesn’t do it for me.  As for your other point, the law and justice are often two different things unfortunately.  I am not speaking about the law only my opinion as to what justice for Jennifer’s family is.  Let’s not forget that none of this would have happened if Dustin had not lured her out of the bar away from her friends.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( wandapc ) on December 05, 2008 at 9:53 am

I would like to know how this case turned into a race issue?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Jim68 ) on December 05, 2008 at 9:42 am

EM,
So the moment Turner and Jennifer left the bar, he took responsibility for her well being? I would use the DUI hit and run example again to explain how the law works. If she were killed by a drunk driver in the parking lot, is that Turner’s responsibility? The law says no. The law also says that if Brown attacked this young woman in a drunken rage and Turner could not stop him, he is not responsible. Turner would have to have participated in abduction, conspiracy, or some other felony prior to the crime to be held responsible for felony murder.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( SWCC92 ) on December 05, 2008 at 9:22 am

EM
Discussing race is not “playing the race card.“ Is stating that our new President is black, playing the race card? Is stating that African Americans deal with a manipulative and deceitful criminal justice system more often than others playing the race card?
As far as the facts of the case; you are simply uninformed. Brown admitted on the stand in May that he did, in fact, try to have sex with the body until Turner stopped him. Testimony by many involved confirm that Brown consumed over 40 drinks that day.
Psychopaths are thrill seekers with no conception of guilt or morality. They do what they want. Brown admits to having no conscience, and the facts support this.
Your assumption that “they” were planning to rape her is not supported by the facts. Turner arranged for Brown to get a ride home with someone else, but Brown was so belligerent and obnoxious, the ride fell through. Does that support your theory? Jennifer’s friends had arranged to pick her up at 2AM. Would she be a good target for this sort of thing?
Why do you say Turner was tricked into telling on Brown? Do you have information about this or is it another assumption?
There is a lot of information out there on this, if you will take the time to check it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJgZ2vrERQc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtwDEteVycM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIUdOG_wWiQ&feature=related

I suggest everybody look into this case, and see how the system works. We deserve better

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement