Gov. Bobby Jindal Is Not Just The GOP Version of Obama
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
CORDEL FAULK
TIMES-DISPATCH GUEST COLUMNIST
Published: December 28, 2008
Is Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal the Republican Barack Obama?
A political podcast I downloaded asked that question recently, but it wasn't the first time I have heard it. It likely won't be the last, either.
We can answer the query unequivocally, here and now: No, he's not -- and he doesn't have to be. There are similarities between Obama and Jindal, but Republicans must realize that the 36-year-old Southern governor isn't a miracle GOP answer to the president-elect.
It is easy to see why some people want to cast the Pelican State governor as a conservative counter to Obama -- and it's not only the two men's shared skin tone. Both are reform-minded political and policy whiz kids who cut to the front of the political line, displacing notorious political machines in Chicago and Louisiana, and quickly zoomed to national prominence. Both also show the best of America: Obama, the highly educated son of an African immigrant, won a seat in the U.S. Senate and the presidency with so-called post-racial coalitions; uber-educated Jindal, whose parents emigrated from India in the 1970s, claimed the governor's chair in a region once wary of those who could be branded "outsiders."
The comparisons present a nice package, neatly tied, for Republicans who want to believe they have an Obama of their own ready to reclaim the mantle from the charismatic Democratic president-elect. Before Jindal said that he will not run for president in 2012, some members of the media also liked the Obama-Jindal narrative because they might have had the chance to bill that year's campaign as a clash-of-the-titans election.
Why don't we all agree to resist the urge to be that superficial? OK?
Obama's story -- told in two best sellers -- is almost universally known these days, so the Cliff Notes' version will suffice for this discussion: Graduated from Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he served as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review, Obama eschewed high-dollar, private-sector salaries to return to Chicago as a community organizer. He was elected to the Illinois State Senate at a young age before running and winning a seat in the U.S. Senate and the presidency in rapid succession.
Let's compare Jindal's story: After graduating from Brown University in the early 1990s, Jindal turned down admission to both Harvard Medical School and Yale Law School, instead heading to Oxford University in England as a Rhodes Scholar. Upon returning stateside, Jindal did not find himself at one of the ivy-covered graduate schools where most former Rhodes recipients tend to congregate. Instead, he wound up as the 25-year-old head of Louisiana's Department of Health and Hospitals after impressing the state's Republican governor, Mike Foster. While his peers were dealing with the normal quarter-life crisis ("What do I do now that I'm an adult?"), Jindal busied himself with turning his department's $400 million deficit into a $200 million surplus.
A series of appointments to difficult jobs followed: executive director of a national commission on the reform of Medicare, president of the University of Louisiana system, assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. He then ran for governor of Louisiana, lost narrowly, won a seat in Congress the next year, and in 2007 was elected governor after Katrina painfully demonstrated to voters why they should have elected him the first time.
Are there similarities between Obama and Jindal? Sure, but so what? And honestly, they aren't stunning. People want to hold the talented brown-skinned Republican up as the foil to the talented brown-skinned Democrat, yet that cheapens the discussion about the merits of both men.
For Jindal's career to be judged a success, he doesn't have to a become the conservative mirror-image of Obama. Instead, his job during these next few years is to be the honest, tough, and smart reformer Louisianans have long needed in the governor's chair. If he does his current job well -- and all indications are that he is doing so with exceptional skill -- then he will be able to stroll onto the national stage.
If he doesn't handle the office of Louisiana governor well, then certainly the Oval Office isn't something he has any business aspiring to occupy.
It's also worth noting a lesson Sarah Palin taught the nation: Don't step onto the national stage too early. Jindal has been governor for one year. Let's wait before handing him a nomination to federal executive office. Americans seem to like choosing governors to serve as president, because they have training in leading large public corporations. There's nothing wrong with accepting that training before deciding if the grind of the presidential campaign -- not to mention the presidency -- is worth all the stress that accompanies it.
When Jindal recently said he will not run for president in 2012, he emphasized that he's rather concentrate on the task ahead of him in Louisiana. That's a smart move. Let's hope it ends the talk of "Jindal: the Republican Obama" before the media spend years building it up -- because the two will never likely run against each other. It leaves Jindal an opportunity to run for president in what's likely to be a more promising year -- 2016 -- when possibly no incumbent president or vice president will be on the ballot. And, it also saves the public from an election dominated by talk of the ethnicities of the two major-party contenders, as opposed to their policy positions and visions for country's future.
When I was in high school I asked a friend of mine on the track team why he was so successful. He attributed it to the fact that he never spent a second thinking about the competition. This friend used all his time to prepare himself for a race -- never obsessing over whether others were preparing better or had the physical talent to beat him. He didn't care how opponents prepared or what physical gifts God blessed them with the day they were born. He called it "running my own race."
He'd say, "I prepare to run my race the best I can, and they never seem to beat me. Even if I did spend time thinking about what my opponents were doing, it wouldn't help, so I don't."
So Gov. Jindal, run your own race. You don't have to be Barack Obama just because you are smart and brown.
Cordel Faulk is communications director at UVa's Center for Politics. Contact him at
.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Reader Reactions
Posted by ( lj4adotcomdan ) on December 29, 2008 at 12:33 am
Toxic avenger: The Times Picayune is a very “pro-Jindal” paper and the article is quite biased. The article, for one, ignored the fact that Jindal called for increased transparency in government, but balked when one legislator wanted to increase transparency on the office of Governor, and then when push came to shove, Jindal signed into law legislation that removed his office from the public records law.
So much for open and honest government. Bobby Jindal is the “do as I say, not as I do” politician.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( lj4adotcomdan ) on December 29, 2008 at 12:26 am
The article has a few things wrong on Bobby Jindal.
It says: “Jindal busied himself with turning his department’s $400 million deficit into a $200 million surplus.“
It states this as if it is a good thing. However, if you dig further into the issue you will realize that he did much more harm than good. During Jindal’s tenure at the Louisiana Department of Health, Louisiana’s health (and the year immediately after) Louisiana’s health ranking dropped to dead last, in part because of a lack of access to healthcare, especially in rural areas. What did Jindal do as head of this department? He shut down clinics in rural areas to save money. So his solution, while good on paper in the short term, actually caused more people to go without needed medical care. This also should lead you to ask this question. Why did Bobby Jindal keep cutting services to people who needed them while running up a $200 million surplus? Why didn’t he stop cutting when he eliminated the deficit?
It says: “Instead, his job during these next few years is to be the honest, tough, and smart reformer Louisianans have long needed in the governor’s chair. If he does his current job well—and all indications are that he is doing so with exceptional skill—then he will be able to stroll onto the national stage.“
What indications are being looked at that say he is doing so with exception skill? The study from the “Better Government Association” that ranked Louisiana first in ethics did not take into consideration all of Louisiana’s ethics laws, just some that are similar among states. (I verified this with the executive director of BGA, something nobody in the media has bothered to do when reporting on Louisiana’s “ranking”). I also verified that Louisiana’s high rank is not because it is “that good” but it is because the other states are just “that bad”. There are two laws that the BGA likely left out of its study. The first law is the one that Jindal signed that eliminated his office from the public records.law. He ran on a platform of increased transparency and he removed all transparency from his office (another study ranked Louisiana dead last on transparency on the Governors office). The other one is the law that Jindal signed that increased the burden of proof required to convict someone of an ethics violation, making it harder to convict people, and thus making it easier for corrupt people to get away with unethical behavior. Seems the only thing that Jindal is doing with exceptional skill is pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes.
I am very glad that the writer is not just drinking the kool aid and jumping on the band wagon like everyone else seems to be doing. However, I am just hoping that the media coverage of Bobby Jindal is a little more “investigative” than the Louisiana Media was when he ran for Congress and then for Governor.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( xyz ) on December 28, 2008 at 6:10 pm
What I beleive, Obama will be re-elected because even if he screwsup, blacks will still vote for him. Few critical whites may leave him but majority of whites who voted for him will like to give him another chance, since Republican party doesn’t have any strong candidate on horizon (Because Jindal is not running in 2012). Now comes 2016 and most probably Biden will try his hands on to be a President, who will be older by eight years from now and will look like a mirror copy of John McCain. Who wants John McCain look alike again as a President? Not many people. So, here comes Jindal from GOP, fresh, young,experienced governor and far smarter than Biden and victory will be his. Remember this when 2016 November comes. Best wishes to Bobby Jindal.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( jerseyneil ) on December 28, 2008 at 4:49 pm
Jindal is the future of the GOP. Palin’s hopes are gone for a national role. While she may get support from the social conservative base, she cannot attract independants, the fiscal conservatives, and Latins and blacks. The GOP cannot survive on the older generation of the Christian white population alone.
It’s smart for Jindal to remain Gov. in 2012. Obama will be re-elected unless he screws up heavily. 2016 is better for the GOP and Jindal.
Jindal is charismatic, an expericenced politician, an intellectual, and youthful. Jindal is no Obama, but can stand on his own record and educational and managerial accomplishments. Like Obama, he brings a different ethnic background and new ideas to the party. Ideas alone without inspiration is like a car without gas.
Obama won by preaching hope, in the midst of an economic crisis. McCain had no chance when tied to Bush.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Victor ) on December 28, 2008 at 4:36 pm
toxic avenger - like I said, Jindal came in with a $1 billion surplus - your article is from March. It’s easy to go crazy with tax cuts when oil makes up 17% of your state’s budget and oil is at record levels. However, compare that to:
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/12/louisiana_faces_2_billion_shor.html
from two weeks ago. He didn’t plan ahead for the possibility of oil revenues going down, and the state is paying the price.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( englishsunset ) on December 28, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Thank God he isn’t like Barry. Amerika only has room enough for one Messiah.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( toxic avenger ) on December 28, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Victor,
May I suggest you do your homework before reading from the democRAT playbook.
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/03/jindal_bats_a_thousand_at_sess.html
But in the end, the GOP will choose their leader based on ideas, goals and past accomplishments. You could say that the Obama’s of the world will always find a home in the DNC, where looks are more important merit.
There’s a reason why Obama targeted the young and dumb crowd and then the minorities (cause it’s always whitey’s fault)!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Victor ) on December 28, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Jindal? A success? He entered the office with a $1 billion surplus. The state, just a year later, now has a $2 billion deficit, thanks to poor planning on his part. If we want another politician like Bush who can’t balance the books, then I guess Jindal’s the man.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( toxic avenger ) on December 28, 2008 at 11:59 am
Actually Jindal has already had success in the jobs or political offices he has taken. Obama on the other hand, has failed at every opportunity and is only the Messiah because he joined a political party more interested in American Idols than merit. Just hope Obama is not another Bill Clinton.
Report Inappropriate Comment