Jones names 2 mayoral staffers
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Will Jones
Published: January 3, 2009
Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones has started to name his administration, beginning with Suzette P. Denslow as chief of staff and David M. Hicks as senior policy analyst.
Denslow has worked as legislative director and deputy policy director under Govs. Timothy M. Kaine and Mark R. Warner. She also was deputy secretary of education under Gov. L. Douglas Wilder and deputy director of the Virginia Municipal League.
Hicks is a partner with the Hicks Tymas law firm and a former commonwealth's attorney of Richmond. He served as chairman of Jones' mayoral campaign and transition team.
Denslow and Hicks "possess valued backgrounds and expertise in the operations of Richmond and municipal government," Jones said in a statement yesterday. "Their experience will be invaluable in moving Richmond forward."
Denslow said she's excited to work for the city as a native Richmonder and having worked in its budget office more than 20 years ago under City Manager Manuel Deese.
"I have a passion for the city. I consider myself a local-government person at heart," she said.
Hicks said he initially wasn't interested in a position with the Jones administration but changed his mind in the excitement after Barack Obama was elected president. Plus, "I really do believe in what he's trying to do," Hicks said of Jones.
Last month, then-Mayor L. Douglas Wilder blasted Hicks, saying Hicks had sought $2 million to settle a lawsuit against the city while also leading the mayoral transition. Hicks said he was not authorized to discuss the lawsuit, which stemmed from the shooting death of Billy Thigpen III by a city police officer in January 2006.
Hicks said yesterday that he is checking with the state bar to make sure his work for the city stays well within ethical boundaries. He would not say how he would avoid a conflict in the Thigpen case.
"I recognize I have to make sure that nothing reflects poorly on the mayor," Hicks said.
Denslow replaces Sandra Robinson, who served as chief of staff to Wilder. Hicks replaces Kim Neal as policy adviser. Robinson and Neal did not apply to keep their jobs, but Neal has transferred to a position in another city department, said William Leighty, co-director of the mayoral transition team.
Denslow and Hicks will receive salaries of $125,000 and $120,000, respectively, and start work next week, Leighty said.
In the statement, Kaine praised Denslow, saying he could not think of a better advocate for the city.
City Council President Kathy C. Graziano said Denslow knows a lot about the needs of cities and that Hicks will provide institutional knowledge that's now lacking at City Hall.
"Having knowledgeable people as opposed to political appointments is going to do a lot to move the city forward," she said.
Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or
.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Larry Lanberg ) on January 04, 2009 at 12:56 am
I share some minor misgivings about David Hicks. As far as I’m concerned he’s got a bit of an anti-police history; recall that he positioned himself as nemesis to dedicated police chief Andre Parker (remember him? He took a bite outta crime before Rodney Monroe was ever heard of). But the choice of Hicks didn’t surprise me, being that Hicks supported Jones. The man’s got to get rewarded I guess.
Ps. That “cesspool of corruption” hype was a bunch of nonsense to begin with. Any city this diverse, this size is going to get a few clowns from time to time. No one man can ever eliminate that probability. It was nothing but a corny sales pitch. Unfortunately it was one that people bit for.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Woodrow ) on January 03, 2009 at 11:57 pm
Lawyers and plaintiffs that filed law suits against the City and former Mayor Wilder have to be licking their chops. Let’s hope Mayor Jones will stand up and not be a push over when it comes to corruption, political insiders and frivolous lawsuits against the City.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( screen_name ) on January 03, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Holy RichmondCesspool!
What is the new mayor thinking when he appoints someone with Hick’s history? Did I read the article wrong, or is Hicks saying that he intends to continue his law practice and AT THE SAME TIME COLLECTING A CITY SALARY OF $120,000 ????????? Obviously $120,000 in pay represents full time pay for a full time city job. If approved by the state bar from a conflicts perspective, it sounds as if Hicks plans to collect two incomes, possibly while conducting his private law practice from City Hall. What would stop him from doing so? If he pledges not to do so, then will he be working perhaps 5 hours per week at City Hall for the $120,000 salary?
Maybe he will practice law by stealth and wear a trench coat, a wig, and dark glasses, hoping that no one will recognize him. I don’t want to see my taxpayer dollars double-paying any city employee. Sure sounds like a ripoff. There ought to be an ordinance which bars any employee from this kind of practice. But oh, isn’t this the same thing Mayor Jones is doing.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( dog1 ) on January 03, 2009 at 10:30 am
Wait a minute.
L. Douglas Wilder was going to eliminate the cesspool of corruption, and failed miserably.
But now Pastor Jones is bringing in David Hicks who incurred major ethical issues over appearing to double pay himself while a city employee. Wasn’t Hicks forced to repay the money, he had improperly taken?
What kind of message does it send for our new Pastor/Mayor - A Reverend, to bring in someone who has been ethically challenged? What does this say about Rev. Jones?
Aren’t the folks leading our city supposed to be caretakers of the taxpayer’s dollars, rather than those who seek to personally profit from it? Who will be watching Hicks to see that he doesn’t again act improperly? Will it be Pastor Jones?
Does this sound all to reminicent of Leonidas Young and Joel Harris, just 13 years later? Alas, should we ask ourselves, which man will play which role?
Report Inappropriate Comment